Good for Goodman?

Like many others, I welcome the fact that Helen Goodman, Shadow Minister for Culture, has joined campaigners in Lincolnshire in calling for a rethink on the Council’s threat of widespread closures or handing over libraries to volunteers. Such support for the library community is always welcome.

However, perhaps we need to view her words with a slightly jaundiced eye and healthy dose of realism. According to the press release:

“Labour is committed to avoiding a postcode lottery; maintaining a core professional service; and modernising and strengthening the role of libraries in the knowledge economy.”

Well, the obvious question becomes what exactly constitutes a ‘core professional service’? For many politicians a small group of professionally managed libraries overseeing or working in partnership with a wide circle of ‘volunteer libraries’ is considered a core service.

Is this what the Shadow Minister means? Perhaps she can elucidate.

Two other points to bear in mind:

Who decides when there is no other alternative? Many councils would argue that due to cuts in central government funding this is the situation they have reached already.

  • During a campaigner meeting with the Libraries All Party Parliamentary Group (20/11/13), Helen Goodman agreed that “…volunteers running libraries in “small villages” was acceptable.”

So does that mean the Shadow Minister agrees with the elements of Lincolnshire’s plan regarding volunteers running libraries in villages?

In principle there is no difference to volunteers running a library in a ‘small’ village and volunteers running a ‘small’ library in an urban area. The fact is both Labour policy and the Minister’s own views support the use of volunteers. (the section has been reworded from the original posting)

Lastly, Labour has already stated that it will keep to the current government’s spending cuts so don’t expect any increases in grants to councils, which in turn will see reduced funding to library services continue.

Other comments on the Shadow Minister’s trip can be seen at: Public Library News and Question Everything


  1. May I help you out about with the difference between a small village library and a small urban library.

    Lower rural population density means that the distance from a village to the nearest town may be too far to allow regular library usage. Public transport links are generally poorer in rural locations for the same reason. Easy access to the local town library is thus likely to be more difficult in a rural setting.

    I would also suggest that the sense of place and the local need and desire to maintain a local service is generally stronger in a village than in an urban setting. The sense of place in an urban setting is often more a connection to the town rather than the particular suburb. There are of course exceptions, for example, some urban communities in London are very strong.

    These factors do need to be considered when determining how best to provide the Council’s library service. A rural library strategy may well be significantly different from an urban library strategy.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.