Damned if we do…

Nowadays it’s not often that libraries receive funding rather than seeing it reduced but the Government’s announcement of £7.4 million to increase wifi coverage and internet access in libraries in England has been broadly welcomed in the sector. This was one of the recommendations in the Sieghart report and will bring kudos to the Leadership for Libraries task force.

Sieghart has stated that “I would hope within 18 months every library in the country – including community libraries – will have wi-fi” so it’s clear that the funding will also be extended to volunteer as well as local authority libraries.

That said, there is some questioning on whether or not this is the most effective use of the funding. Commenting on the above article Mick Fortune pointed out that “…leveraging the millions already invested in RFID and using Wifi to help link physical stock to relevant online resources – as is already being done in some European public libraries – and ticking three boxes at once – digital, WiFi and the exploitation of under-used resources” might be the best way forward.

So perhaps the scheme might be refined as it evolves in consultation with library services themselves. Given the IT expertise available in libraries (not just public) Cilip perhaps have a part to play in advising on the best way forward.

More controversial was the additional funding provided by Barclays and BT to provide free wifi and digital support to 57 libraries and 13 community centres in deprived areas across England. This includes support from “Barclays Digital Eagles, specially trained members of Barclays staff who…will work at the new Wi-fi sites to help local people build confidence and develop the skills they need to succeed in the digital world.”

Leaving aside the rather naff name of ‘digital eagle’ (in the public sector we just call them IT support!) many voiced concern via Twitter regarding the ethics of such funding. Particularly from a Bank that has been mired in scandals around Libor, mis-selling PPI, and manipulating energy prices, all of which have incurred massive fines along the way.

I share some of the concerns raised. Unfortunately, the political reality is that libraries are not masters of their own destiny and librarians do not get to make the final choice in these circumstances. Such decisions are made by councillors, cabinet members, and council leaders. Right across the political spectrum it would be a brave council that rejected funding for libraries on ethical grounds.

So while such considerations might give many within the profession pause it would be almost impossible to convince either the public or more importantly council members to reject corporate funding.

Equally, Sieghart has made it clear that this is just the beginning and says that “the government and the task force will [also] look at big corporations making donations of kit – tablets, screens, keyboards etc.”

So given Sieghart’s views and Paul Blantern’s, Chair of the task force, approval of his own library service establishing a donation scheme, it appears that greater corporate and commercial sponsorship of libraries is here for the forseeable future. Whether or not you approve of this will depend on your political outlook and opinion on how public services should – or should not – be funded.

What is becoming obvious however is the fact that the corporate approach is so closely aligned to the current government’s views and ideology that it undermines any claim of independence or impartiality from either Sieghart’s report or the task force. At best the task force represents a mix of political expediency and financial pragmatism. Given that Labour has broadly hinted it will continue with Sieghart’s recommendations I see no genuine change of course from that quarter should they form the next government.

After years of reductions and underfunding councils will take what monies they can get regardless of the ethical credentials of the donors. And I sometimes wonder if the public genuinely care as long as libraries doors are kept open?

So for librarians it’s a case of damned if we do and damned if we don’t, which just goes to prove that occupying the moral high ground can be a very lonely watch indeed.

6 thoughts on “Damned if we do…

  1. Equally, Sieghart has made it clear that this is just the beginning and says that “the government and the task force will [also] look at big corporations making donations of kit – tablets, screens, keyboards etc.”

    I agree with your comments Leon, however what alarms me is the absence of mention of books. I am an ebook reader, and also of course a user of Wi-fi and have most of the required kit. But in my group of friends and acquaintances, all ages, all backgrounds, several countries, I am a rare animal. Most use books, buy and borrow books anmd do use text but not much else. I don’t want to see public libraries be limited to ebook uses only. Libraries are for everyone!

    Like

    • I agree Frances. Like you I am an avid reader and so are many users of libraries. Despite almost being ignored the fact is the majority of people still use libraries for literacy and learning…and books!

      Like

  2. Some might be accused of having risen to their lofty positions in the profession by pulling out the pitons hammered into the rock wall by those who preceded them – leaving their more junior colleagues completely unprotected, dangling over an abyss.

    Can it be claimed that the mandate of the professional bodies has been squandered? I’d like to see their leaders, and any of the current neo-liberal pragmatists within their ranks, stand up for the common good and demonstrate that they wish to reclaim the “moral high ground”, in at least word (loudly) if not deed.

    And I take issue with the implication that the “high ground” is the exclusive preserve of members of the profession! To add insult to injury, you add: “I sometimes wonder if the public genuinely care as long as libraries doors are kept open”. Please take a few hours, days or weeks to revisit the efforts of many many thousands of ordinary citizens over the past 5-10 years to keep their public libraries ‘public’ and retain their paid staff.

    Start by noting that over 1700 of the morally-impaired(?) public have, in the past 6 days, signed a Petition not to privatise the third floor of Cambridge Central Library:
    https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/don-t-privatise-the-third-floor-of-cambridge-central-library

    My somewhat violent reaction to what I have read here is tempered by the knowledge that outfits like Voices for the Library seek to *narrow* any gulf between Librarians and library campaigners & users. Indeed they, and others of like mind, hammer away to replace the pitons yanked out by others (whether these enemies inhabit the profession or the many other ££ interests outside it).

    Rest assured: If divisions are encouraged, if people of like mind don’t settle for conquering the mountain together, failure is inevitable. It will be cold comfort, then, to hang a gold medal for superior morality around anyone’s neck. We must unite – and urge any people who are sitting on the fence or, more crudely put, hanging onto the central government or town hall t*t for sustenance, to get off it.

    Like

    • Shirley, while I agree in general with your comments you have taken some of mine out of context. In the context of the post I was referring to those few librarians and library staff who had commented on Twitter about their unease with corporate sponsorship as being the one’s holding the moral high ground. This was not to exclude anyone else but the post is a discussion specifically about corporate sponsorship in libraries and how the profession should respond.

      Equally, the comment about the public not caring should again be seen in the context of the post. I was questioning whether people care about where funding comes from for wifi in libraries and I stand by my point that I suspect the majority of the public do not. This is an entirely different matter to those that campaign to protect libraries from closure and retain paid staff. People can campaign to keep their library open but not particularly care who provides and pays for the internet access in that library.

      Best wishes

      Leon

      Like

  3. Pingback: Library News Round-up: 23 March 2015 | The Library Campaign

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s